[ad_1]
Russia’s refusal to pay $50 billion to former Yukos shareholders will result in new investigations.
Alexey Golubovich, founding father of the Arbat Capital group of firms
On March 31, the Moscow Metropolis Court docket will think about an enchantment, which was filed towards the ruling to pay $35 million to former Yukos shareholder Alexey Golubovich by his ex-wife Olga Mirimskaya. Allegedly, she acquired the cash for the sale of Yukos shares 15 years in the past, and her ex-husband requested for his share as a part of the divorce proceedings which have been ongoing for the final ten years. These are uncommon calls for as Mirimskaya has by no means owned shares within the oil firm. As well as, Golubovich was not solely its shareholder, but in addition served because the director for strategic planning and company finance at OAO NK Yukos and was conscious of all data associated to the monetary dealings of the oil large. A journalistic investigation carried out by Pravda.Ru confirmed that Alexey Golubovich seemingly nonetheless works in shut collaboration with different ex-owners of Yukos.
Alexey Golubovich, a former shareholder of Yukos oil firm, and Olga Mirimskaya, the chairwoman of the Board of Administrators of BKF Financial institution, divorced in 2012, however the litigation over the division of their marital property continues to this present day. Olga Mirimskaya is the founding father of the Russian Product Firm. She can also be President of BKF Financial institution. Mirimskaya is charged with giving a bribe — two autos price a complete of three.25 million rubles — to Yury Nosov, an investigator on the Moscow Area Division of the Investigative Committee in 2017. He dealt with the case, through which she appeared as a sufferer in reference to the kidnapping of her daughter. Nosov and Mirimskaya had been arrested within the bribery case. They plead not responsible, claiming that the case has been initiated below false pretences with malicious intent.
“In line with the defendant, the case was initiated by Alexey Golubovich, in addition to by her former common-law accomplice Nikolai Smirnov, a co-owner of the Golden Crown fee system, as an act of revenge for the return of her daughter, to be able to seize her property,” Mirimskaya’s lawyer Alexander Chernov mentioned.
This story developed final week when an individual named Sergei Sokolov was arrested. Sokolov, who had a earlier conviction, was arrested for soliciting a bribe of 33.5 million rubles from Mirimskaya’s lawyer Yulia Zhuravleva, who acts as the one consultant of the accused within the civil case, through which she is suing her ex-husband.
Witnesses below assault
Olga Mirimskaya’s story is intertwined within the case of the oil firm, through which her husband labored.
“Mysteriously, two witnesses within the Yukos case began having critical issues with Russian legislation in 2021 after which in 2022,” the Versiya publication famous. “Tellingly, it was their testimony that served as the premise for Leonid Nevzlin‘s life sentence,” (Nevzlin, one of many former leaders of the oil firm, is hiding in Israel. — Ed.)”.
Leonid Nevzlin
These witnesses are Olga Mirimskaya herself, who was arrested and despatched to a pre-trial detention heart on December 17 final 12 months, and the proprietor of a small joint-stock firm AO Yuzhno-Aksyutino, with is registered in Dmitrov, close to Moscow. Since 2016, AO Yuzhno-Absyutino has been below the management of the Moscow Regional Tax Service. The Federal Tax Service claims nearly 500 million rubles in unpaid taxes, which truly accounts for the corporate’s belongings.
At this time, “the whole lot seems to be like a brand new and highly effective celebration has appeared within the case of AO Yuzhno-Aksyutino and Yevgeny Rybin. Because of this, it turned recognized that the Dmitrov Investigative Committee initiated a hefty tax evasion case towards Rybin. It seems that a brand new participant has emerged within the course of to jail one of many witnesses within the Yukos case and pores and skin them to the bone,” the Versiya wrote.
In the course of the trial within the Yukos case, Yevgeny Rybin testified that in 1998-1999 he fell sufferer to 2 tried assassinations. Leonid Nevzlin was subsequently charged with organizing these makes an attempt.
Newsru.com on-line publication reported that Olga Mirimskaya testified towards Nevzlin at court docket. She claimed that “Nevzlin suffers from an obsession for persecution.” Allegedly, he collected compromising proof towards each the corporate’s staff and different individuals and subsequently took benefit of it to make the selections that he wanted. When testifying in court docket, Mirimskaya mentioned that two makes an attempt had been made on her life. The sufferer might solely suspect the Yukos safety service as perpetrators, which Nevzlin supervised. Yevgeny Rybin additionally then mentioned that Nevzlin was obsessive about homicide.
“This can be a man of a maniacal character, an unbalanced character, able to something, a killer within the truest sense of the phrase. Many individuals will likely be in peril till he’s jailed,” Rybin mentioned on the trial.
Many spoke about Nevzlin’s vindictiveness.
“It was scary to speak to Nevzlin at occasions,” Olga Kostina, who labored below Nevzlin’s direct supervision, advised the Izvestia newspaper. He’s obsessive about the superpower and tremendous alternatives of particular providers. His credo: concern is the best method to manipulate individuals.” Kostina stop. She went to work on the Moscow mayor’s workplace. “Nevzlin was continually harassing me, he was looking for out what I used to be doing, why I wasn’t telling him what was occurring within the mayor’s workplace,” Kostina continued. — I might say: “I not be just right for you.” However he would say: “No, you are fallacious. You at all times work for me.”
In November 1998, a bomb blew up on the door of Kostina’s condominium. As well as, it was proved on the trial in Pichugin’s first case that it was him, who, on Nevzlin’s order, organized the assassination try on the previous worker.
On August 1, 2008, the Moscow Metropolis Court docket sentenced Leonid Nevzlin to life imprisonment. The decision was introduced down in absentia, the ex-owner of Yukos was on the run. He at the moment resides in Israel, and his powers in Russia are clearly restricted, however not in the whole lot. In line with lawyer Alexander Chernov, Mirimskaya’s ex-husband Alexei Golubovich may very well be concerned in initiating the case towards her.
“Regardless that they divorced a very long time in the past, they nonetheless share property. Not that way back, Golubovich filed a lawsuit to share Olga’s jewellery gadgets that had been acquired throughout their marriage,” Chernov mentioned.
The protection lawyer added that on December 16, in the course of the course of investigative actions taken as a part of the bribery case, investigators seized all of her consumer’s jewellery gadgets with out justification.
“At the moment, Smirnov’s and Golubovich’s legal professionals seem in numerous civil and legal instances towards Mirimskaya. Apparently, they’ve mixed their efforts,” the lawyer concluded.
The jewellery gadgets that had been seized from Mirimskaya in December as a part of the bribery case in Moscow, now seem in a divorce case in London. That is an incredible coincidence that’s inconceivable to imagine. The “coincidence” occurred to be able to acquire the jewellery stock for a listening to within the Excessive Court docket of London, the place Golubovich hopes to assert a share of Mirimskaya’s jewellery.
The editors studied the paperwork of the trials, together with the trials of Mirimskaya and Rybin, and got here to conclusion that Olga Mirimskaya’s ex-husband may very well be a potential “accomplice” of Leonid Nevzlin and different former high managers of Yukos in Russia. We discovered many different unusual coincidences and inconsistencies, the potential beneficiary of which was none apart from Alexey Golubovich and Yukos ex-owners.
A unifying thread
Aleksey Golubovich said on many events that he had had nothing to do with the ex-owners of Yukos after 2001. Nonetheless, the details show in any other case.
In December 2016, the Kommersant reported that Aleksey Golubovich was going to construct a manufacturing facility for the manufacturing of polyester fiber for the wants of sunshine business within the Ivanovo area. He’s the only proprietor of JSC Ivanovo Polyester Complicated JSC. Vnesheconombank (VEB) gave the entrepreneur’s firm a mortgage price 20.4 billion rubles.
VEB CEO, Sergei Gorkov, reported to Vladimir Putin in February 2017:
“In December, we permitted a number of initiatives, such because the Ivanovo Polymer Plant, for instance, for he manufacturing of technical textiles. There was no such plant in Russia, this can be a huge funding price $500 million.”
It will increase to 30 billion rubles.
In August 2017, economist Nikita Krichevsky urged on his weblog on Ekho of Moscow that a part of the VEB mortgage, which was raised for the development of the Ivanovo Polyester Complicated (IPC) may very well be absorbed by the buildings managed by Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
Mikhail Khodorkovsky
“The price of the IPC development goes by weird adjustments,” MK famous on the subject of Krichevsky’s publication on Ekho of Moscow. “The quantity of the mortgage offered by VEB has grown from 20.4 to 30 billion rubles in simply a few months.”
Within the spring of 2015, the Governor of the Ivanovo area, Pavel Konkov mentioned in an interview with RIA Novosti that the development, which was lobbied by Deputy Minister of Business and Commerce Viktor Evtukhov, was estimated at 17.7 billion rubles. Noteworthy, Gorkov, the then chairman of VEB, comes from Yukos too.
In line with the Vedomosti newspaper, the IPC was purchased out by Cypriot firm Honson Administration Restricted, whose final beneficiaries are Sergey Presnyakov (a bit greater than 50 p.c), Alexei Golubovich (25.1 p.c), Alexei Prudnikov (about 15 p.c) and Ruslan Kryazhev (about 10 p.c). In the course of the Nineteen Nineties, Kryazhev, like Golubovich, labored throughout the Yukos buildings, the newspaper mentioned. The discrepancy within the information led Krichevsky to imagine that Golubovich was the nominee shareholder. In line with him, within the Czech Republic, Khodorkovsky is related to businessman Dushan Novotny, who, because the Komsomolskaya Pravda wrote, “ensured Khodorkovsky’s pursuits in plenty of improvement initiatives of such firms as Panorama, Unistav Holding and Novodevelop.” Czech holding Unimex Group is linked with them by Unistav Worldwide. It was Unistav that turned the contractor for the development of the manufacturing facility in Ivanovo. Unusually sufficient, the initiators of the venture — Alexey Golubovich, VEB and the Ministry of Business and Commerce — didn’t discover Russian development firms that will be able to implement a price range of greater than 100 million euros.
“The IPC program turned out to be unprecedented by way of the conceitedness of the scheme to withdraw public funds, not someplace overseas, which sadly is frequent observe, however relatively for the good thing about (…) Mikhail Khodorkovsky,” Krichevsky said.
The truth is, the development price a lot lower than 20 billion rubles. Czech firm Unistav estimated the development of the plant within the Ivanovo area at $140 million, or 8.4 billion rubles. Nonetheless, after the scandal, the venture was scrapped.
One could make one other comparability. The capability of the IPC was declared at 175,000 tons of fiber per 12 months with the venture price of 25-30 billion rubles. After the closure of the Ivanovo venture, the federal government of the Rostov area introduced the development of an analogous plant with a capability of 75,000 tons per 12 months and a value of solely 3 billion rubles. That was 4-5 occasions cheaper than the IPC venture, considering the capability and the price in rubles (it’s even cheaper in overseas forex). Was Nikita Krichevsky proper that the venture was designed to withdraw VEB funds overseas? This seems to be a rhetorical query.
It’s worthy of observe that not all contributors of the scheme with the IPC and Khodorkovsky really feel nearly as good as Alexey Golubovich, the supervisor of the Arbat Capital fund, and Viktor Evtukhov, who nonetheless serves because the Official Secretary of the Ministry of Business and Commerce. Former Governor of the Ivanovo area Pavel Konkov was arrested in 2019 and nonetheless stays below home arrest as a part of the legal case on corruption offense. This can be a complete totally different story, although.
Buddha Witnesses
One can hint Golubovich’s connection not solely with Mikhail Khodorkovsky, but in addition with different former high managers of Yukos. In 2020, it turned recognized that the daughter of Alexey Golubovich, Nataliya, filed a lawsuit on the Excessive Court docket of London. She accused her estranged father of stealing sculptures price greater than £4 million throughout a collection of in a single day visits to her house, The Each day Mail reported.
“Mom-of-two Nataliya Golubovich, 26, claims Alexey Golubovich ‘systemically’ took a considerable a part of a group of 349 sculptures from her £10-million London home, in keeping with paperwork filed within the Excessive Court docket,” the British publication reported.
Between 2012 and 2016, he was mentioned to have visited the Hammersmith mansion on a number of events and used suitcases to hold the artwork items away.
“It’s understood the artwork assortment consists of a number of statues of Buddha alongside a spread of uncommon items from the Far East. It was amassed by Mr Golubovich’s ex-wife, Olga Mirimskaya, to furnish the household house in London, in keeping with the court docket declare. Russian retail tycoon Miss Mirimskaya is alleged to have purchased the artworks from gross sales in London, Paris, and New York, and had a private account at public sale home Christie’s,” the British newspaper wrote.
It’s not even the lawsuit itself that’s curious on this case as that is primarily a household matter. The case is to be heard this 12 months, and it’s price being attentive to the checklist of witnesses, which Aleksey Golubovich ready for the upcoming court docket sitting. There are a number of Yukos ex-employees amongst them, together with, for instance:
- Yuri Beilin, former vice-president of the oil firm, who’s on the worldwide needed checklist,
- Nina Gorbonosova, former subordinate of Alexey Golubovich,
- Svetlana Romanova, auditor of Yukos’s Cypriot firms,
- Gitas Anilionis, the right-hand man of Platon Lebedev, the previous head of the Board of Administrators of Group MENATEP,
- Andres Baumgartner, a lawyer who represented Golubovich in all transactions with GML (Group MENATEP Restricted), at the very least in 2003-2009, that’s, at a time when Golubovich allegedly had no contacts with former shareholders of Yukos.
It seems that even within the course of towards his personal daughter, Alexey Golubovich couldn’t do with out the Yukos “human capital”.
Can this affirm that Alexey Golubovich remains to be involved with Yukos former shareholders? At the very least fairly not too long ago, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta urged that Alexey Golubovich, the previous director of strategic planning and company finance of OAO NK Yukos, might grow to be a defendant in new investigations of legal instances towards the previous shareholders and individuals related to them. This pertains to their $50 billion lawsuit towards Russia pending in The Hague.
It’s price remembering that in 2020, the Court docket of Enchantment in The Hague upheld the 2014 arbitration award, through which the Russian Federation was ordered to pay $50 billion in compensations to a few former giant shareholders of the Yukos oil firm — Yukos Common, Hulley Enterprises and Veteran Petroleum Ltd. that had filed a lawsuit by GML (Group MENATEP Restricted). In November 2021, the Supreme Court docket overturned the ultimate resolution of the appeals court docket, in addition to the court docket’s earlier resolution. The Supreme Court docket upheld one of many grounds for the Russian Federation to enchantment. The case was submitted to the Amsterdam Court docket of Enchantment for a brand new resolution on this floor. Given this resolution within the Netherlands, the data that Golubovich obtained and hid funds for the sale of shares to former Yukos shareholders or for different causes may very well be of specific significance to subsequently dispute their improper claims towards Russia. On this case, apparently, it’s helpful for somebody to maintain Olga Mirimskaya behind the bars in order that she doesn’t have an opportunity to say something about this case.
To be continued…
[ad_2]
Source link